Two stories that discuss the topic:
+
Here are some of the "rules" that changed right after the inauguration:
+
1/22/2021 WHO warns of 'false positives' in COVID tests, says some patients might not be 'truly infected'
+
1/23/2021 WHO Modifies CCP Virus Test Guidelines, Warns Against Overreliance on PCR Results
+
1/24/2021 Hydroxychloroquine may have some use to treat COVID after all, NJ study shows
+
1/24/2021 Researchers Retract Study Linking Hydroxychloroquine to Heart Risk
=
2/1/2021 Facebook Oversight Reverses Hydroxychloroquine Censorship Decision
"Facebook's misinformation and imminent harm rule, which this post is said to have violated, to be inappropriately vague and inconsistent with international human rights standards."
=
My statement:
All of these were considered "dissenting views" for the greater part of the year on social platforms and in every day media. Many were banned/censored/attacked and discredited if they tried to discuss these ideas.
My questions:
How many died because HCQ was prohibited for a period of time here and not used? (It was used elsewhere.)
How over inflated were the COVID numbers because the dissenting view on high cycle PCR tests was suppressed (censored)?
Why did this all happen after the inauguration? (My Answer: Politics.)
My final thoughts:
Think about the cost of silencing a dissenting view (censorship) and allowing only 1 aspect of thought to permeate the airwaves (propaganda).